Gena Edvalson

A Utah woman separated from her child hopes the hyphenated name on his birth certificate will prompt him to look for her some day.

Gena Edvalson became a parent in 2006 when her lesbian partner of six years conceived via in vitro.  The couple raised the child together until their breakup in 2007 and had both signed a co-parenting agreement.  Unfortunately, biological mom Jana Dickson is now married to a man and wants the child to have nothing to do with other mom Edvalson.  Dickson is legally represented by the conservative Alliance Defense Fund.

Utah Third Judicial District Court ruled this month that Edvalson has no rights to the child and must lose even the weekly visitation the judge had previously granted. The court also stated that the co-parenting contract “directly offends the state’s public policy that parents retain the fundamental right to exercise the primary control over the care and supervision of their children.”

After the ruling, Edvalson wrote on her personal site:

Last week the judge ruled in her favor. . . . I lost my son. He lost another adult (nay, a mom) who loves him. They lost their souls.

The Salt Lake Tribune covered this story and explained how even contracts don’t protect gays in Utah.  In that article, Edvalson mentions that she hopes the hyphenated name on her son’s birth certificate will someday lead to a reunion.

For now, Edvalson… is keeping an online journal to record her experience in case her one-time son someday notices the hyphenated last name on his birth certificate and has questions.

Such a sad situation.  My heart goes out to Ms. Edvalson and the little boy who is surely missing her terribly.

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

Kelly Utt-Grubb Wedding

I’m asked every now and then how in the world I pulled off a career giving naming advice with Utt-Grubb as a last name.

I know, I know. My last name isn’t exactly one that little girls grow up writing on the backs of their notebooks. It isn’t pretty. It doesn’t blend in.  Someone once joked that taking naming advice from me must be like taking interior decorating advice from Ray Charles!  That was funny!  But seriously, my work with Name Counsel clients isn’t about which last name sounds better with their first name or which last name is easier to spell.  Those things may or may not be important to an individual client, but they aren’t of primary importance in the big picture.  What IS important is figuring out what last name is going to feel comfortable and meaningful for the long haul, and in that case I am most certainly practicing what I preach.

To understand why I do what I do, you have to first know my personal story.  When I got married in 1998, I knew I wasn’t comfortable discarding my last name and taking my husband’s, but I wasn’t sure what else to do.  I considered the other options that I knew about at the time, which were hyphenating my maiden name with his or simply keeping my last name.  Neither my husband nor I thought at all about the possibility that he could modify his name.  I agonized over the decision.  I didn’t really know anyone who had made a nontraditional name choice, and I didn’t know where to turn for advice.  Most of the ever-growing stack of wedding books on my kitchen table certainly didn’t address this issue, and if they did it was only to say that nontraditional last names created unnecessary hassles and confusion.

To make matters worse, my husband’s family was very conservative and did not approve of me at all. They made it abundantly clear that they did not want me marrying their son. A part of me, albeit an obviously delusional part, thought that taking my husband’s name would somehow make his traditional family approve of our marriage.

I reluctantly followed tradition and changed my last name to “Grubb”—and with that settled for what I knew deep down to be all wrong for me. I remember being excited to officially start a life with my husband, but that wearing only his last name simply didn’t feel right. I also remember giving emphatic instructions before the wedding to our officiant in hopes that she would at least pronounce us “Sam and Kelly Grubb” rather than “Mr. & Mrs. Samuel Grubb” after the ceremony, and I remember the knot in my stomach when she accidentally did the latter.  I’ve been over that day countless times in my mind and it really should have been different.  I arrived at that Charleston wedding garden as Kelly Utt, eager to celebrate my love for my husband with our family and friends, believing in the institution of marriage as I defined it and trusting that somehow I would come to terms with what I stood to lose. Although the ceremony was beautiful— no one “gave me away” like property or mentioned “obeying”—I walked away feeling, already, invisible as I was announced as Mrs. Samuel Grubb.

By the time I was pregnant with our first child two years later, using just the name “Grubb” had become nearly unbearable.  Like so many women, I felt I had lost a part of my identity. Being called “Kelly Utt” had always been a source of familiarity and comfort, much like seeing the same curly hair and brown eyes staring back at me from the mirror every day of my life. I remember completing the information for our son’s birth certificate and being close to tears as I wrote his last name, “Grubb.”  After all, he was just as much a part of me as he was my husband.  His perfect little body had grown inside mine.  It was shortly thereafter that I decided to hyphenate my last name and become “Kelly Utt-Grubb.”  My husband and I agreed we would change our infant son’s last name too, and by the time our second son was born two and a half years later, my husband had decided to begin using the hyphenated name as well.  I’ll never forget the day that Sam told me he was hyphenating his name. He said that as our boys grew up and he talked to them about things like marriage being a partnership and equality of the sexes, he wanted those values to be reflected in his actions.  I was impressed.

For us, embracing Utt-Grubb was about embracing who we were– good, bad, or ugly.  If one or both of us had had a pretty name I might have missed out on the self reflection that led me to a deeper understanding of how important names are to us all.

As you might imagine, the personal experience led naturally to the career when I realized no one had stepped up to provide guidance to those seeking help with family naming dilemmas.  It’s still rather shocking that I am the only person doing this, but I certainly won’t complain.  Every day I work with clients who for one reason or another are considering a name change, and every day I remember that knot in my stomach at the wedding garden.  Names are closely tied to identity.  They impact our lives in countless ways.  They matter.

I wear my own name much like a wounded war hero wears a scar.  I fought a battle for this name!  The scar might not be pretty, but it reminds me of my strength.  It reminds me of my integrity.  It reminds me that I’m in a loving relationship.  It reminds me that I’m setting a good example for my children.  It reminds me of my purpose in this world.  And I hope it reminds others that a meaningful last name is worth fighting for.

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

man-tioro-engagement-ring

Have you heard of it?  It makes perfect sense, really.  A male version of the engagement ring is now available in response to demand from women wanting to propose to their men or to show that their man is spoken for, as well as gay men who want to propose to their male partners in a traditional way.  The ring should be worn on the left ring finger just like it is for women.  Some claim it should be transferred to the right ring finger after the wedding, while others say it should be worn on the left ring finger along with the wedding band.

Details Magazine has a great piece by senior writer Ian Daly in this month’s issue.  Daly does a good job of providing real life examples to support his observation that this is no longer a ladies-only affair.  He covers it all, from stories of women who have proposed to their man to the appearance of the term ‘mangagement ring’ on the internet and the clever marketing tactics of jewelry stores hoping to cash in on the idea.  My soon to be married brother– who has been wearing a real life male engagement ring since January– is even quoted.

Dan Utt, 25, who runs an after-school program in Cary, North Carolina, remembers when the feeling hit him. He was at the jewelry store with his girlfriend, Amanda, shopping for her engagement ring, he says, when “I kind of under my breath was like, ‘I want one too.’” His decision to act on that impulse didn’t go over too well in Morrisville, where he lives. “Some of the guys and girls I know have given me some grief,” he says. “My boss was getting a lot of questions too. I told him that if anyone asks to jokingly tell them that we didn’t think it was fair for her to have the only pre-wedding bling.”

Thinking back to my own engagement in 1998, my husband and I certainly would have purchased him an engagement ring if we had thought about it.  We found ourselves bucking tradition in many ways– we agreed to the engagement, rather than him surprising me with a proposal and we now share a hyphenated last name that is a combination of our “maiden” names– yet we went through the down on one knee proposal ritual as if we were obligated to.  It was all fun and exciting, but it would have been great if the engagement activities better reflected the equality in our relationship.  Maybe we could have done the one knee thing together, humbly asking the honor of sharing the rest of our lives.

I can’t help but see how this trend is related to the surge of nontraditional last names.  Both reflect the growing desire of modern men– straight and gay– to be part of romantic relationships that are true partnerships in every sense of the word.  I love it!

*The ring pictured above is by British jeweler H. Samuel and is called the Tioro.  It retails for £79.99.

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

new name thanks

This week’s Dear Margo includes a terrible story about a father who passed off his live in mistress as a long lost daughter. He claimed that the “daughter” was from a relationship he had in his early 20s and the family bought it.  They welcomed her with open arms and included her in family events until one day the real daughter came home from college a day early to find her father and the mistress having sex.   Real daughter called her mother, who came immediately home to confront her husband and fake daughter/mistress.  The father/husband then had the nerve to say he wanted to flaunt his (fake) “daughter” to the family because he was making up for lost time in the sex department.  His wife filed for divorce.  Real daughter understandably wants nothing to do with the man and has therefore changed her last name to her mom’s maiden.

Although a situation like this isn’t common– thank goodness– the desire to change a name that’s associated with a difficult past is.  I see it all the time in my consulting practice.  Whether it’s because of a link to a childhood abuser, a source of frequent teasing and harassment, or a remnant of an unhappy marriage, a name that has baggage is often discarded.  It’s absolutely reasonable to choose a name that feels good.  Mother’s maiden sounds like a great solution in this case.  Real daughter, if you’re out there reading, let me know how the new name is working out!

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

Barack Obama

Just announced — President Barack Obama proclaims June 2009 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month.  YAY!

This is outstanding news for those of us who support the human experiences of love and family without regard to sexual orientation.  Through this proclamation, President Obama has shown both courage and compassion.  I applaud him!

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

Elizabeth Edwards

So Elizabeth Edwards, wife of disgraced former senator and presidential candidate John Edwards, doesn’t want Rielle Hunter’s name mentioned during interviews.  Rielle is the woman John famously cheated with, and her baby may be his too.    Elizabeth has had a really hard time– the death of a teenage son, incurable cancer, and John’s cheating– and she claims that saying the other woman’s name will bring that woman into the light.  The thing is, Elizabeth is promoting a new book about her experiences called Resilience.  Most legitimate journalists won’t do an interview where there are restrictions placed on the questions they can ask.

Jane Podesta of the Huffington Post put it well:

After the disastrous book tour launch of her confessional Resilience, Elizabeth Edwards isn’t going quietly into the night. Now her misguided publicists are telling the media that Edwards won’t grant any interviews with reporters who mention the name of John Edwards’ one-time mistress — Rielle Hunter.

Maybe that tactic works with Angelina Jolie in empty-headed interviews about her latest refugee mission, but Edwards used to understand that professional journalists wouldn’t allow her to dictate their questions. She isn’t a Hollywood celeb but the wife of a one-time presidential candidate who still owes his followers some answers. Most reporters are refusing to go along.

Edwards can’t have it both ways — insisting that she won’t sit back as the passive political wife and disappear, while cashing in on her family’s personal crisis. Where were the fawning political handlers who once surrounded this couple, when she agreed to head off to promote this book? And what happened to the old Elizabeth Edwards who wasn’t afraid to answer any question hurled at her on the campaign trail?

I honestly get the power of a name, but come on!  If Elizabeth doesn’t want Rielle’s name uttered, then she shouldn’t have written a book about the situation.  Sheesh.

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

Maine

Same-sex marriage became legal in Maine today, and New Hampshire is reportedly close to legalizing it in their state as well.  That makes Maine the 5th state to have legalized gay marriage and leaves Rhode Island as the only hold out in the New England region.

As I’ve said before, I strongly support the human experiences of love and family without regard to sexual orientation.  Hoorah!

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

German flag

Ms. Thalheim (a dentist) and Mr. Kunz-Hallstein (a lawyer) cannot become Mr. & Mrs. Thalheim-Kunz-Hallstein according to a 1993 law that was upheld by Germany’s highest court Tuesday.  The couple wanted to share a surname, while each maintaining professional names.  They believe the law violated their right to free choice and could be damaging their careers, but the court thinks a triple-barrelled name is confusing and makes it difficult to trace family lineage.  The AP reports:

The Karlsruhe-based Federal Constitutional Court rejected their claim, ruling the law exists to prevent clunky “name chains,” while still allowing couples to decide for themselves which last name, or two-name combination, they wish to take on.

“This addresses the wish to create names that are viable in legal and business dealings, while at the same time do not lead to name chains in later generations,” the court wrote.

In a telephone interview with the New York Times, the couple’s lawyer, Rüdiger Zuck, said his clients had no comment on the ruling, but added, with what sounded distinctly like a note of resignation, “The Germans are old-fashioned.”

Boo!  I wouldn’t choose a triple-barrelled name for myself, but this couple has a good reason for doing so.  Names should definitely be a matter of personal choice. 

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

Abortion adoption

Yes, you read that right.  A California man has symbolically adopted his wife’s two aborted fetuses and given them his last name.  According to Fox News, Stan Musil said he filed the posthumous “adoption” as a way to support his wife, Lisa, and help her heal from the pain of having those abortions.

Adoption law expert Rod Stoddart:

“I explained that it’s not possible from a legal standpoint, because there’s no birth certificate and no child living now to be adopted,” Stoddart told FOXNews.com. “But from an emotional standpoint, there’s no reason why we could not do an agreement between them where he would adopt those children and give them his name.”

Lisa Musil, now 45, had her first abortion at 19 and continued on a path that led her to substance abuse as well as a subsequent abortion.  She claims that the emotional pain was often too much to bear.

My first response was to scoff, but after considering this further I think it’s a really nice idea.  Sharing a family name is obviously really important to this couple.  Here is another story that illustrates just how meaningful last names are to us all.  Congrats to the Musils!

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

Obama's new puppy Obama's new puppy close-up

The Associated Press reports that the Sasha and Malia finally got the new puppy they’ve been waiting for.  Can you guess what they named him?

Internet websites and bloggers were full of speculation about the puppy over the weekend, but none guessed the name correctly.  Turns out the Portuguese water dog is named ‘Bo’– an apparent reference to singer Bo Diddley.  (Michelle Obama’s father was nicknamed ‘Diddley.’)

I love the fact that there is so much interest in the dog’s name!

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl